Revolt on Health Care Bill of Obama

There's a revolt going on against Obama's austerity Health Care reform bill. No one wants to go along with health care rationing, including Harlem NY's own Charlie Rangel, Congressman and head of the powerful Ways and Means committee. Orszag is looking like a fool, the Nazi minister of Budget cutting, and the House bill was delayed on July 10 with revolts all over the place. So, beginning Monday morning, the British-controlled Washington Post lead editorial complained along with Obama and called for health-care costs to be cut. It is "a ticking time bomb," and Congress must "defuse the bomb" by adopting a commission like the "base closure commission," which would give Congress an "up or down vote" on what medical treatment will be paid for. London's Financial Times insisted that Obama can—and will—win the health-care vote by simply accepting the tax on employer-provided health benefits. Employer benefits are a menace anyway, says the FT, because they lead to "overconsumption" of medical treatment. The British newswire Reuters also says "failure is not an option" for Obama. The "dire consequences" of failure will force Obama to come up with a bill. Meanwhile, the revolt continues. The USA does not have to go along with the new version of the British NICE agency, to cut and kill.