Syria Bombing for a Bad Youtube Video

How could Trump be fooled by this.?? He must be really desparate because of all the Russia hysteria.   We had a US/French/British bombing of Syria for a bad YOUTUBE video, produced by the British intelligence operation known as the "White Helmets."  These are really the friends of all the terrorists and Al-qaeda creeps in Syria.... and also the ISIS.... Damn British Lies Stand Exposed More and More: The British hand behind the Big Lie which charged the Syrian government with gassing its own people April 7, now stands more exposed each day, before the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has even started its work on the scene (expected by April 18.) This exposure...

Trump and the Stock Market Crash

Hmmm Politico.com is crying over British agent Christopher Steele.... how amusing.... screech screech.  What a joke.

Hey Harlem and Bronx dudes... crash, correction, it is all related... A choppy wall st... but does it make a difference... :?  Are they freakin out that Trump loyalists Devin Nunes and Sen. Grassley are fighting back.... Of course the British are in a total freakout, but what else is new.....  Return Chris Steele to his MI6 owners.... time to make him talk.  But they won't let him talk in London, cause MI6 "Mother" and the British Foreign office are watching the trials there...

Russia gate is BS

We heard it from the hackers themselves, VIPS leaders, Bill Binney and Ray McGovern. Russiagate is total BS... a scam to use Robert Mueller as special prosecutor to bring down President Trump.  The tricks of the British Empire endless war party to save their bankrupt empire, and have nuclear war if they can get away with it.

Trump is still in the fight

Trump is still in the fight but it is difficult.... we can see Ms LaRouche deployed at the Manhattan meeting of the Manhattan Project. We know the British have a coup detat against Trump... they said that in the British Spectator magazine.  Harlem ny dudes know what it's all about.

The shock of the Trans Atlantic establishment is still so weird and horrible. So watch the video.

Trump vs the Oligarchy, Russiagate fraud

Trump is the target, but not the program.  Our President is trying to build infrastructure and do good things.... The City of London British Empire and NYC Wall Street oligarchy does not like production and doesn't believe in infrastructure or economic progress.  They are insane, running military war games, nuclear war scenarios, etc... Tune in for the Monday show, with your host Matthew Ogden and special guest, Mike Billington from Executive Intelligence Review magazine.

The world situation is very serious. You could say there are currently three scenarios spinning, each with the same purpose of ousting the elected President of the United States. In order of their appearance, they assert that Donald Trump should be out of office: 1) because he colluded with Russia to undercut U.S. elections; 2) because he is unhinged, and will foment nuclear war over N. Korea; or 3) because he is a racist. In other words, "Russia-Gate," "finger on the nuclear button," and now, "Charlottesville."

Thus, the LaRouchePAC-initiated mobilization to make known the July report, "Was the Russian Hack an Inside Job?" by the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) is not at all a simple move to "set the record straight" about a filthy operation, but a drive to bust up the whole treasonous coup operation against the United States, and defeat the neo-British Empire gang behind it.

Why are they doing these things? Because the potential is so great for the ever-strengthening New Silk Road drive to involve the United States—along with the Americas and all others—and finally and fully displace the rotting monetarist system. Trump has expressed pleasure at working with the leaders of this new paradigm—Pres. Xi Jinping and Pres. Vladimir Putin. Trump is on the record for favoring the key economic measures involved, Glass-Steagall and infrastructure. Lyndon LaRouche's "Four Laws" is out there to provide the guidance.

The British Monarchy Hacked Trump

Hey Harlem NY dudes, get the intel, get the groove.
If the Russians didn't do it, the hack, the leak, the subversion of Trump and the election, then who did it??????

Petition to President Donald Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20500

Lyndon LaRouche has stated that with respect to the ongoing fraudulent Russiagate scandal directed at President Trump, “The American people must demand that the ongoing treasonous British coup against the Presidency, and the nation itself, be stopped and the perpetrators prosecuted and imprisoned.” We, the undersigned, agree with that statement and the following:

1. The Veterans Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) has presented evidence to President Trump that Russia never hacked the Democratic National Committee. The emails in question were leaked by an insider, not hacked, and were subsequently altered to attribute responsibility to Russia. A new special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate those responsible for perpetrating the resulting hoax which has so damaged and divided our entire nation.
2. There is abundant evidence in the record showing that British institutions and agencies conducted a concerted attack on candidate and now President Donald Trump in order to influence and then reverse the U.S. election result. The actions of “former” MI6 agent Christopher Steele and his firm Orbis Business Intelligence—involved in creating false and salacious accusations against the president after being paid over $1,000,000 by supporters of Hillary Clinton—are fruitful targets for investigation, as are actions of GCHQ (the British NSA). If British interference is shown by a new special prosecutor’s investigation, the “special relationship” between the United States and Great Britain should be cancelled in all respects.

In the words of LaRouche, “Cancel the British system. Save the people.” Printable version of petition.

Signed,

Impeach Obama, impeach we beseech.  If you, Harlem dude, of NYC want to survive.

The geezer's friend said: I thought you made the comment last night in the discussion, that history is on our side, the empire is crumbling, and you have the emergence of what you just referenced with these two triads, in Europe and in Eurasia; and you also have what is happening here in the United States, including what happened with Kesha Rogers' campaign in Texas last week, but that it's a very dangerous time, because at the point that a new Roman Empire, in the form of the British Empire is crumbling, they would threatened the extermination of the human race, just like Zeus did in the event of the collapse of their power. And so, you made the comment on Friday, if you want to prevent thermonuclear war, impeach Obama, now. That's the only strategic option for the United States.

RT nails British Royals and Nazis

Russia Today got it right about Prince Charles and the British Royals and Nazis.  What nerve for Prince Charles to call Putin a Hitler figure.  What is Putin supposed to do, let NATO march into the Russian base at Sevastopol and do nothing???  The British real estate grab has gone too far.

Russia Today TV News ran a short but devastating exposure of Prince Charles and the Nazi-loving royals, in the wake of Prince Charles's attack on Russian President Vladimir Putin as a modern Hitler.

Senior political correspondent Anissa Naouai on RT's "In the Now" program told her viewers:"If anyone knows real Nazis, it's the Royal Family."She proceeded to show a royal family tree connection to Hitler and the Nazis, featuring Queen Elizabeth II, Edward VIII, Prince Philip, Charles, and Prince Harry. She proceeds through each, starting with the Duke of Windsor, Charles's maternal great-uncle, photographed visiting Hitler at his Obersalzberg retreat in 1937, shortly after abdicating as Edward VIII, and adding that his wife, Wallis Simpson, "hung out with Hitler." Next she displays Prince Philip revealing that his sister Sophie married an SS officer. This was followed by the famous picture of Philip between his two cousins, both Nazi Party members, decked out in their Nazi uniforms; Naouai points out "There's Daddy, on the right." It concluded with the photo of Prince Harry, wearing his Nazi uniform, about which Naouai says,"And then Prince Charles's very own son likes to dress up like a Nazi even if it's just for Halloween," adding: "Perhaps royals are better seen and not heard."

Meanwhile, the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office refused to respond to Russian concerns over Prince Charles's comment that Putin is Hitler. At a meeting at the FCO, a British official told Russian Deputy Ambassador Alexander Kramarenko yesterday that "the Foreign Office could not be expected to comment upon reports of private conversations," despite the fact that Kramaranko had reportedly said that Charles's comments were "unacceptable."

See LPAC's exhaustive documentation: 'It's the British Empire, Stupid!'

Russia Today Op-Ed: Charles's Remarks Furthering a "Move to Nuclear War in Europe"

"Are we witnessing the death throes of the British monarchy?"reads a subhead in in Russia Today by Tony Gosling, a British activist and investigative journalist. It is yet another article blasting the satanic Prince Charles for comparing Russian President Putin to Hitler, and this article takes on the strategic dimension, saying the monarchy is bringing about nuclear war:

"Outside his charmed circle, Charles's ungracious remarks .... demonstrate both a perverse underplaying of the 25 million Soviet dead of World War II and a further move toward nuclear war today in Europe," Gosling writes. "The party leaders [in defending Charles] have also refused to recognize Charles's own government and armed forces backing for the post-coup Ukrainian government, key Right Sector elements of which proudly sport pictures of Nazis such as war criminal Stepan Bandera on their Kiev walls."

The article goes all the way back to 1348 in chronicling the crimes of the British royals and Empire, playing up every known detail about the Nazi connections of Prince Philip, King Edward (who abdicated), and even of Charles himself.

It spotlights the documentary film "Unlawful Killing" about the murder of Charles's wife, Princess Diana, and points out that the film has been effectively banned in the United Kingdom.

The satanic Prince may have inadvertently done one good thing with his stupid remark: He provoked Russia to openly go after the British Empire and all its evil roots.

Gosling's lengthy article starts by demolishing the lie that Charles was making a "private statement," and then gets right to the Nazi point:

"Charles's flippant remarks draw unwelcome attention to his own and his family's close connections to Nazis, and related war-mongering.

"His father Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, was educated for a time in Nazi Germany, and his four sisters married black-uniformed SS officers (three of them, Sophie, Cecile, and Margarita, joining the Nazi party). Philip admitted to them having 'inhibitions about the Jews' to an American academic, and feeling 'jealousy of their success.' Charles's great uncle, the abdicated ex-King Edward VIII, was such a swastika-waver that MI6 had to banish him to Bermuda for the duration of World War II, thwarting his and his Nazi wife, Mrs. Simpson's, attempts to join Hitler by crossing into occupied Europe.

"Charles himself has come quite close to publicly endorsing Hitler's slippery chief Architect and Armaments Minister Albert Speer by hiring Speer's greatest devotee, Léon Krier, as his own chief architect for his Duchy of Cornwall's extensive building projects. Writer and broadcaster Jonathan Meades in his 1994 documentary, 'Jerry Building' nails Krier as the 'Speer-carrier' and 'Keeper of the Toxic Flame,' pointing out that every one of Speer's creations, which include the Nuremberg rally stadium, is inseparable from the inhuman experimentation and forced concentration camp labor used to construct them."

The lengthy article has a wealth of detail about centuries of crimes by the British royals.

Gosling notes that Charles I "lost his head" in 1649, and concludes the article saying that Charles' remarks and those who defend them, "represent one more nail in the coffin of the British monarchy."

Can Hillary Clinton Hack It?

The British Empire wants to run a world war, a nuclear war.  Obama cannot hack it.  Does the US want to join Satan???  The British Empire is a disaster.  Within this the financial system, including Wall St. is about to go into a bail-in process.  Hitting the British Empire and Wall St simultaneously, the bail-in, will blow out the Trans-Atlantic system. The banks are finished Glass Stegall Act or die.

Jive Talking on Syria War

Contrary to the usual jive talking on the Syria war, the rebels are NOT taking over, and the Syrian government still runs most of Syria, including all the large towns. Patrick Cockburn, writing in The Independent in London, continued his reporting on his recent trip to Syria and Beirut, exploding the myths peddled by nearly all the Western press based on fairy tales from the British-Saudi terrorist networks running London's "regime change" operation. Last week Cockburn reported that he had driven from Damascus to Homs without seeing any signs of war, and in a 12/30 article he adds that this was equally true of his drive from Damascus to Beirut. "Driving the short distance between Damascus and Beirut is like shifting from one planet to another," Cockburn writes. "What seems obvious and commonsensical in the Syrian capital becomes controversial and a minority viewpoint over the border in Lebanon. Outside Syria there have been repeated media and diplomatic forecasts of imminent victory for the rebels and defeat for Bashar al-Assad. Ignored in this speculation is the important point that Assad's forces still hold, wholly or in large part, all the main cities and towns of Syria. "The difference in perceptions inside and outside Damascus is explained partly by the way the international and regional media describe the war. There are few foreign journalists in the Syrian capital, because it is difficult to get visas. By way of contrast, the rebels have a highly sophisticated media operation — often also foreign-based — proffering immediate details of every incident, often backed up by compelling, if selective, YouTube footage. Understandably, the rebel version of events is heavily biased towards their own side and demonises the Syrian government. More surprising is the willingness of the international media, based often in Beirut but also in London and New York, to regurgitate with so little scepticism what is essentially good-quality propaganda." Most importantly, Cockburn points to the open U.S./British support for terrorists in the oposition: "The policy of the US and its allies is increasingly bizarre: on the one hand, they recognise the opposition National Coalition as the legitimate government of Syria but, on the other, they label its most effective fighting force, the al-Nusra Front, as 'a terrorist organisation' linked to al-Qa'ida. Just as in Iraq after 2003, Syria has become a magnet for jihadi fighters across the Muslim world."

It's a Sandy and weill world

Sexy sandy, ohoh,
What have you done, sexy sandy;
You broke the rules, you went the way of Glass Steagall,
You went the way of Glass Steagall,
Sexy Sandy Weill, the greatest (what?) of them all;

Beatles spoof song, Sexy Sandy, or it was, Sexy Sadie

While members of the LaRouche Political Action Committee rallied outside, in his two-hour appearance before the House Finance Committee today, Timothy Geithner was confronted with calls for the reinstatement of Glass Steagall and forced to admit that despite his knowledge of criminal fraud being carried out in fixing the Libor rate, he failed to make a criminal referral to the Department of Justice, as required.
Geithner's appearance today was preceeded by news that the former CEO of CitiGroup, Sandy Weill, known as the "Shatterer of Glass Steagall," had called for the reinstatement of Glass Steagall. The appearance was also preceeded by news coverage in the New York Times, which quoted the former special counsel of the the Federal Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FFCIC) saying that Geithner had an obligatin to make a criminal referral and by news coverage in Washington Post which quoted Neil Barovsky saying that Geithner used the Libor rate, which he knew was fraudulent to determine how much AIG had to pay back the government and to set the interest rate for the TALF.
As the hearing opened, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) began by reporting on Weill's call for the reinstatement of Glass Steagall, describing it as "absolutely huge." She said, "I feel that that is a very strong statement, stronger than the Volcker Rule, calling for the strictest Volcker Rule possible, a return really to Glass-Steagall." She then asked Geithner, "I would like a detailed answer in writing on what does this mean to the financial crisis if investment banking and banking had been separated, what would that have meant for AIG, for Bear Stearns, for Lehman, for Wachovia for all the big banks."
Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC) stated that "the two worst votes I made in the 18 years I've been in Congress were, the Iraq war, which was very unnecessary and the repeal of Glass-Steagall." He then asked Geithner, in light of reported losses at JPMorgan, "Isn't it time to have a discussion and debate about the reinstatement of Glass Steagall?" Jones also added that he hadjoined Rep. Marcy Kaptur in cosponoring HR 1489, which calls for reinstating Glass Steagall, and called for a hearing in the committee on the measure.
Later in the hearing Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Mich) also asked Geithner for his response to Weill's call to reinstate Glass Steagall. Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass) also raised Weill's call during his questioning. And Rep. Steve Pearce (R-NM) asked for a copy of Geithner's response as requested by Maloney to Weill's call for the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall.
The snake that he is, in answer to Jones, Geithner came out against reinstating Glass Steagall by arguing that it was considered during the deliberations on Dodd-Frank, which he described as "tough" legislation. He then appealed to the Congressmen to "give those reforms a chance to take effect and work."
At the same time Geithner was repeatedly confronted with his criminal complicity in the coverup of the Libor fraud.
Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala), asked Geithner when did he report the Libor rate fixing to the Treasury and to the Department of Justice and to whom? Geithner avoided answering the question in respect to the Department of Justice and instead said that he reported it to the President's Working Group on the Financial Markets in 2008 when he was head of the New York Federal Reserve. Bachus followed up by asking the question raised in the Washington Post by Neil Barovsky, as to why he used the Libor rate, which he knew was fraudlent for AIG and TALP. Geithner's answer was: "We chose LIBOR at that point as did many others."
Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) followed up on this line of questioning by pointing out that Geithner's "early response" to knowledge of the Libor rate-fixing "was to keep using it." He also took issue with Geithner's statement that "it was our best choice." Hensarling said: "How can a number you know was manipulated be the best choice?" Hensarling also forced Geithner to admit that he was not obligated to use the Libor rate.
Other Republicans followed suit. Rep. Garret (R-NJ) told Geithner that he cannot have cake and eat it too, pointing out that he never once mentioned to the committee in multiple appearances that the Libor rate was fixed. Nor did he mention it during the entire debate over Dodd-Frank.
Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas) revealed that there are reports of emails about the fixing of the Libor rate dating back to the fall of 2007. Geithner claimed that he only remembered hearing about it in 2008, but said that he is reviewing his earlier emails. Neugebauer stressed that what was involved was not merely a structural problem but was fraud and referring to the comments by the former special counsel to the FFCIC asked Geithner, did he not have an obligation to make a criminal referral? b~~~~While a number of Democrats were soft on Geithner's responsibility for Liborgate, in some cases trying to blame it on the Bush administration and thus let Geithner off the hook, Brad Miller (D-NC) pointed out that the emails reveal not just an opportunity for manipulation of the rates, but an actual criminal act. He then repeated the question first posed by Bachus, which Geithner did not answer. Did you report this to Justice? Geithner initially tried to squirm out of answering the questin by saying that he did not know what the NY Fed staff did. But Miller pressed him and asked specifically whether he, Timothy Geithner, reported it to the Justice Department. Geithner's answer says it all: "No, I did not."
As he was waiting on line to get into the hearing former New York State Governor and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer remarked that Weill's about face is a "game-changer."