Not Climate Change Harlem, China Development

 Hey Harlem and Bronx NY, we know what time it is.



 The issue is not climate change, it is economic development, it is going to space and getting Helium-3 on the moon for fusion power.  Time to impeach Obama and get with the program.  now.



At Joint Press Conference With Obama, Xi Extends Invitation to US to Join New Silk Road | LaRouchePAC



Much hype is being made in the press and by the U.S delegation about the
agreement signed on climate change. In the Climate Change Agreement,
China commits to bring its use of "non-fossil fuels" by 2030 to around
20%. The U.S. promises to reduce CO2 gas emissions by 2028 to below 2005
levels. While the U.S. was pushing such a climate change agreement as
the only real area of cooperation they have had with China for which
they wanted some "deliverable agreement," and China, for its own
reasons, went along with it, it should be noted that "non-fossil fuels,"
in the Chinese view also includes nuclear energy, which, of course, the
U.S. side never mentions. China additionally wants to bring down the
pollution caused by fossil fuels in China, but the agreements reached
with the U.S. are not binding. And, judging from the reaction of a
Republican-dominated U.S. Congress, the indicated cuts may be prove well
beyond the ability of the lame-duck President to deliver. 

Global Warming Action Cost Money

We all love the environment and the warm and oozy feeling we get thinking about helping Mother Earth, but it costs lots of money. Global Warming action is the most expensive of all, a fact that is being noticed in the discussions for the Copenhagen summit. Why the rush? These guys are trying to hash out an agreement by December, as if we are all going to be poisoned to death by CO2. Remember that you normally exhale and manufacture CO2 with every breath you take.


According to the NY Times--- The price tag for a new climate agreement will be a staggering $100 billion a year by 2020, many economists estimate; some put the cost at closer to $1 trillion. That money is needed to help fast-developing countries like India and Brazil convert to costly but cleaner technologies as they industrialize, as well as to assist the poorest countries in coping with the consequences of climate change, like droughts and rising seas.

Comment- the last sentence is total BS. How much have we helped Indonesia and other victims of the great Tsunami of a few years ago, totally unrelated to Climate Change? It's all a fraud.