Does the EU really want WW3?

 That is the question, does the European Union really want World War 3. Their weird military mobilization is very sad, as their energy situation collapses and living standards collapse too....

In a March 8 statement Helga Zepp-LaRouche asserts:

"If the EU and the individual European member states now sabotage Trump’s intention to end, together with Russia, the Ukraine war which was a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia from the beginning, then they are making a catastrophic historical mistake. If they then also attempt to finance the enormous lack of military capabilities by creating money outside the regular budgets, they are repeating German Reichsbank President Hjalmar Schacht’s policy of Mefo bills from the 1930s. At that point, the great war with Russia and with all the countries with which Russia is in a strategic partnership would become a self-fulfilling prophecy!"

It's not only the EU which is pushing delusional financial schemes, but members of the Trump Administration, apparently with the President's approval, are recklessly moving toward merging the U.S. Treasury and (unconstitutional) Federal Reserve with the crypto currency domain, which will ultimately blow out whatever stability is left of the U.S. dollar.

There is a precedent for these schemes which didn't end well, referenced by Helga Zepp-LaRouche above.

The United States needs to return to a solid, production-based economy, driven by a commitment to scientific and technological advancement which is the only way to raise the standard of living of the American people and create the conditions for peaceful relations with the rest of the planet.

Press Conference on Immediate Nuclear War Danger

 

View this email in your browser

Emergency Press Conference: The Danger of Nuclear War Is Real, and Must Be Stopped Wednesday June 12, 2024; 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. (U.S. Eastern Time) National Press Club, Washington, D.C.; and online at schillerinstitute.com Speakers · Scott Ritter: former U.N. weapons inspector and U.S. Marine intelligence officer; · Col. (ret.) Richard H. Black: former head of the U.S. Army’s Criminal Law Division at the Pentagon; former State Senator, Virginia · Ray McGovern: former CIA analyst and co-founder of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) · Helga Zepp-LaRouche: founder of the Schiller Institute Host Schiller Institute Brad Lander at Peace Rally Rally for Ceasefire in Israel Palestine Gaza Rally for Peace in Israel Gaza Palestine war.... see pictures above. On June 3, the U.S. State Department prevented U.S. citizen Scott Ritter from boarding his flight to St. Petersburg, Russia, and seized his passport. Ritter, a former U.S. Marine officer and United Nations weapons inspector who has become a prominent opponent of the current war policy, was traveling to participate in the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), which is being attended by an estimated 19,000 people and 3,400 media representatives from some 130 countries. Ritter was subsequently able to participate in the SPIEF panel via Zoom. In addition to the clear First and Fourth Amendment Constitutional issues raised by the Ritter case, the content of what Ritter was going to discuss is key: the need to improve U.S.-Russian relations and stop the escalating danger arising from NATO’s current posture towards Russia, as seen most starkly in Ukraine, which is dragging the world towards a nuclear World War III. The May 22 attack on a critical Russian early-warning radar system at Armavir, purportedly by “Ukrainian” drones, could have been the event which tipped the balance towards war—because it could have confirmed for Russia their stated belief that NATO and the West are intent on “blinding” Russia’s early-warning system in preparation for a possible “preemptive decapitation” strike by the U.S. and NATO against them. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated exactly this concern, publically, and it is the height of arrogant foolishness of the West to dismiss this as a “bluff,” as so many in Washington, London and other NATO capitals are now doing. As dangerous as attempting to blind Russia’s early-warning radar, are the efforts to silence opposition voices who function as a kind of “early-warning” system in the domain of policy deliberation—those who are warning of the danger of nuclear war, and are presenting alternatives to a policy of confrontation. On Wednesday, June 12 at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., a distinguished panel of four experts will each make brief presentations on these topics, and will respond to questions from the media, both in person and over an international Zoom link (with simultaneous interpretation into German, French and Spanish for audiences in those countries). IN PERSON PARTICIPATION: Seating is limited, so please RSVP to questions@schillerinstitute.org ONLINE JOURNALIST PARTICIPATION: Journalists wishing to participate on-line, please send an email to questions@schillerinstitute.org Please indicate your name, media you represent, and language preference (English, German, French and Spanish can be accommodated), and you will receive a link by email. GENERAL PUBLIC: The public in general can view the online English-language live stream on schillerinstitute.com Watch Online

Sign up today for EIR's NEW Daily Alert! We are pleased to announce EIR's new daily news website. If you have not already renewed your subscription, check out this one-month free offer!