Friday, November 16, 2012
Pay per Post Makes you Larger
Pay Per Post makes you larger, but it could also make you small. And the cookies that Mother gives you don't do anything at all. Then I ask:
a xenophobia. How will you eat yours? When she's ten feet tall.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Obama Eats Doggy Doo
Obama eats doggy doo. That doesn't mean he will lose for sure, but for the USA and the human race, he has to lose. Let me remind you about Obama's recent crimes and what happened in Benghazi, Libya. So Harlem dudes, get the word out: Screw Obama sideways.
Another government document that was commissioned by the Defense Department, written by the Congessional Research Division of the Library of Congress, and in the public domain since August 2012, proves that the intelligence was out in the open that Al Qaeda was operating in Libya, that Ansar al-Sharia "increasingly embodied al Qaeda's presence in Libya," and that the United States was its target.
Daily Beast reporter Eli Lake reported yesterday morning (Nov. 5) that, "Before the attacks, the U.S. intelligence community didn't consider Ansar al-Sharia a threat to American interests, and the group wasn't a priority target for the CIA officers monitoring jihadists in Libya, according to U.S. intelligence officials with knowledge of the investigations into the Benghazi attacks."
But, he notes, "Some analysts in the intelligence community disagreed with the official assessment.... A public report released in August by the Library of Congress at the direction of a Pentagon organization that focuses on counter-terrorism research concluded that Ansar al-Sharia "increasingly embodied al Qaeda's presence in Libya." But this wasn't the prevailing view...."
Now, after Amb. Chris Stevens and three other Americans are dead, Lake writes, "the intelligence community has begun to reassess its view of Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi, in part because the attacks there included not only that groups members but two other al-Qaeda-affiliated groups: al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and the Jamal network."
The actual references in the Library of Congress report about Ansar al-Sharia are much stronger than what Lake and other reporters who have mentioned this report have said. In fact, the report points to the fact that Ansar al-Sharia was working as an umbrella for the other Al Qaeda militias not using the "Al Qaeda" brand name because the brand name was an instant death warrant.
Below are the references in the August 2012 report that is titled, "AL-QAEDA IN LIBYA: A PROFILE," A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Offices Irregular Warfare Support Program, August 2012."
* Page 1: Ansar al-Sharia, led by Sufian Ben Qhumu, a former Guantanamo detainee, has increasingly embodied al-Qaedas presence in Libya, as indicated by its active social-media propaganda, extremist discourse, and hatred of the West, especially the United States.
* Page 2: "Ansar al-Sharia (Supporters of Sharia), a militia group led by Sufian Ben Qhumu ... could be the new face of al-Qaeda in Libya despite its leaders denial.... Ansar al-Sharia is a Salafist-jihadist militia based in Benghazi.
* Page 3: "The name Ansar al-Sharia is also being used by al-Qaeda in the Lands of the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in so-called liberated areas of Yemen and by Salafist groups in Tunisia. The Facebook sites of Ansar al-Sharia in Libya and the group in Tunisia appear similar in design and content and also share contacts, suggesting coordination between the groups.
Page 3: "Various militias, also known as katibas (battalions/brigades), from throughout Libya are thought to ... make up the bulk of al-Qaeda's network in Libya, as indicated by the attendance of the first gathering of groups supporting sharia held June 78, 2012, at Liberation Square in Benghazi, hosted by Ansar al-Sharia.
"Page 18: "Al-Qaeda will probably refrain from using the al- Qaeda name and instead may use other names, such as Ansar al-Sharia, or simply mujahedin."
There are dozens of other specifics detailed in the 54-page report which can be found at URL http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/LOC-AQ-Libya.pdf
Monday, November 5, 2012
Obama Genocide World
Obama is genocide and world war thermonuclear style. Vote no on Obama the ultimate evil. Obama is evil, obama is satan, Obama is the worst of all evils.
Lyndon LaRouche today returned to the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., for the first time since 1986, to deliver a powerful repudiation of both of the two major party presidential candidates, and warn that the world is facing the gravest crisis in modern times, centered on the immediate danger of thermonuclear war and a trans-Atlantic hyperinflationary breakdown. LaRouche was joined in the press conference by Jeffrey Steinberg, a senior editor of LaRouche's flagship publication, Executive Intelligence Review.
The conference was attended by diplomats from Western Europe and Africa and by media from the United States, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and South America. The entire event was recorded by three TV networks, including LPAC TV, which will be posting the full video of the press conference, along with a transcript, within the next 24 hours.
LaRouche began the press conference by spelling out the strategic crisis and the fact that neither Obama nor Romney was qualified to deal with the crisis. Obama's re-election, LaRouche warned, would be tantamount to guaranteeing thermonuclear confrontation between the United States, Russia, and China — with the triggers already set in the unfolding Syria crisis.
LaRouche forcefully warned the audience, "From my standpoint, we are in the worst crisis that the United States and other nations related to it, have ever experienced. And the election itself, or the results of the nominal election, if it can actually be settled, is really of secondary importance. The real news is going to be evident after the election proceedings have nominally closed. That's when the fun will occur. Not now, before the election, but once the election day has been completed, all hell will bust loose internationally...
"The crucial issue, the most crucial issue, is the threat of thermonuclear war. That is the pregnant issue going on here.
"Now, the incumbent President is for a military confrontation, which, in fact, if it's executed, will be thermonuclear. And as most of you who are experienced know, thermonuclear war would begin, perhaps, launched by Mr. Obama, on behalf of the United States, and within minutes after Mr. Obama had launched World War III, or 5, or 6, or whatever it's going to be, you would have then a reaction from certain European nations, which would be called into play under their agreements. You'll have Russia, China, and probably India as the principal leaders of the opposite side.
"If thermonuclear war were to occur, under expected terms today, it be completed, essentially, within the range of an hour and a half. Because that's thermonuclear war. And when you measure thermonuclear war against the capacity of the submarine fleet of the United States, in launching these kinds of weapons, after an hour and a half of warfare, among these contenders, and those associated with this contention, there won't be much left on the planet...
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Printer-friendly version
Send to friendThursday, October 25, 2012
Dump Obama, Listen to LaRouche
If you are having trouble viewing this message, see it in your browser.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Bronx First Fridays, Dia de los Muertos
1040 Grand Concourse at 165th St Bronx NY 10463 718-681-6000 | www.BronxMuseum.org
 |
||||
|
Friday, November 2,
2012 6:00pm to 10:00pm First Fridays! 1040 Grand Concourse at 165th St Bronx NY 10463 718-681-6000 | www.BronxMuseum.org
| Nov. 2nd Lower Gallery Free Admission! 6:00pm Free guided tours of the galleries and Día de los Muertos art-making workshop 7:00pm Banda de los Muertos fires up the crowd with its brassy, hot-blooded banda music from Sinaloa, Mexico. Loud and emotional, the banda sound is a boisterous crossbreed of traditional Mexican music and German polka, powered by ranks of brass, woodwinds, and percussion. This epic 10-member band storms the stage with soulful sounds from 1940s Mexico mixed with funky New York flavor—written and arranged by bandleader Jacob Garchik. With special Día de los Muertos performance by artist Aurelio Del Muro. Presented in collaboration with Carnegie Hall’s Neighborhood Concert Series. |
Harlem Dudes, Break the Banks
Harlem dudes, time to get down with Robert Reich and break up the big banks. Obama will lie, but we need the Glass Steagall. Still hoping to remove Obama and put in Romney, maybe then we can break up the banks and get Glass Steagall.
On Oct. 18, Robert Reich called on Obama to break up the nation's biggest banks and to resurrect Glass- Steagall. The op ed argues that if the President took such action it would be good policy and would smoke out Mitt Romney.
Earlier this year, in July, immediately after Sandy Weill had recanted his opposition to Glass-Steagall, Reich had written an op ed in the Huffington Post entitled: "The Man Who Invented 'Too Big to Fail' Banks Finally Recants. Will Obama or Romney Follow?" in which he concluded in a manner not based on the party system: "What's the betting that one of the presidential candidates will take up Weill's proposal?"
Three months later Reich ostensibly launches into an attack on Romney as Wall Street's candidate, knowing full well that it has been Obama who has opposed Glass-Steagall, implemented the bailout of Wall Street, and pushed the Dodd-Frank Act, which maintains the too big to fail policy. He does so even though in the first debate, Romney called for repealing Dodd-Frank and eliminating the policy of too big to fail.
Reich writes: "The President should counter Romney's extraordinary solicitude toward the Street with a proposal to cap the size of the nation's biggest banks so that no bank is ever again too big to fail. And to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act, which once separated commercial from investment banking. In the 1980s the ten biggest banks had less than 30 percent of bank depositary assets. Now they have 54 percent. And the four biggest now dominate the Street almost completely. Because lenders and investors know they're too big to fail, the four biggest banks have a competitive advantage over smaller rivals that pose larger financial risks. That means they'll only get bigger. Breaking up the biggest banks and capping the size of all banks is hardly a radical suggestion these days. The Dallas Federal Reserve Board, which has never been accused of excessive liberalism, has called for it. So has Sanford Weill, the creator of Citigroup, one of the biggest of the big. So has Daniel Tarullo, the Federal Reserve governor charged with bank regulation. So have conservative commentators such as George Will.... Calling for a breakup of the biggest banks and a resurrection of Glass-Steagall would smoke out Mitt Romney — revealing clearly and decisively he's not on the side of most Americans."
Reich is correct that Romney, like Obama, has not endorsed Glass-Steagall. It is also true that on economic policy he is presently in large part captive to Republican Party ideology.
However, the fact that Sandy Weill and a number of conservatives have endorsed Glass-Steagall points to the potential of freeing Romney from the Republican Party ideologues who oppose it.
Is it possible that Reich, in making this proposal, is actually trying to smoke out not just Romney but also Obama, who for the last four years, with help from Geithner and Holder, among others, has in fact defended and bailed out Wall Street at the behest of the Queen of England to the detriment of the American people?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)